送你SAT写作范文
孤灯长巷 2018-07-16     14:55 来源: 来自互联网
评论 0
点赞0
阅读 55
sat

送你SAT写作范文

为了帮助大家高效备考SAT写作,下面三立小编为你带来送你SAT写作范文,让你学到技巧,减少分数的丢失,希望对你有所帮助,更多资讯请访问三立在线教育,专业老师为你在线解答相关疑问。

   To the extent that Sita Slavov presented a strong and convincing argument claiming that the practice of carbon tax charge is a better policy compared with a pure Vacuum Ban, the author has managed to achieve so by using both psychological as well as semi scholarly sources to support her argument, and by listing a number of real-life examples to gain an echo from her audiences in an empirical way.These strategies suggest that Sita Slavov structured her persuasion by adopting both pure-rational and emotional means.

   Starting from analyzing the big picture, the methodology and structure that Slavov adopted to construct her think piece is fairly creative. To review her article from a macro prospective, the author did not start to pose out her own argument until the last two paragraphs. As a matter of fact, Slavov used a significant length of lines to introduce her readers the background knowledge as well as relevant disputes around the issue at present. In doing so, Slavov could not only offer her readers a comprehensive abstract of the issues core but could also do foreshadowing for her personal arguments as follow----since the present disputes make sense respectively while cannot pose out a reasonable evaluation of the ban policy, a third party train of thought is necessitated, hence Slavov used these introductory sections as a perfect guiding stone for her body partand conclusion. Moreover, such high percentile of introductory length would inspire her readers brown study on the issues essence by themselves rather than merely ponder over current disputes.

From a comparatively micro point of view, the author adopted both rhetorical as wellas academic strategies to frame her paragraphs.

   Firstly, Sita Slavov took a quite prominent political prospective, mainly because she is trying to comment on the core and influence of an EU policy. Although thepolicy itself aims to improve human environment and is hence categorized as an environmental public policy, the author didnt try to take an environmental stand of point and construct her piece into academic. Rather, she attempted to criticize the authority of the European Unions bureaucratic legislation itself. In doing so, she has successfully managed to interpret the core of the issue into the governments violation towards peoples freedom of choice inconsumptions rather than if the vacuum ban policy itself would be effective and environmental friendly. In doing so, Sita Slavov further took an anthropological prospective to convince her readers that the vacuum ban policy is deeply lack of legitimacy. Specifically, the author used two constant rhetorical questions to emphasize on the governments lack of legitimacy and accuse the government of taking intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions. By using such methodologies, Sita Slavov could successfully evoke her readers aversion towards the authoritys behavior and would hence turn to support his argument.

   Moreover, to strengthen her demonstrations, the author quoted a comparatively largeamount of evidence. Specifically, in the second paragraph, Sita Slavov mainly referenced semi scholarly data and statistics to claim why the negative influence of EUs public policy would be so profound. Meanwhile, in the third paragraph, Sita intended to use real life evidence to convey the message that such policy is absurd in practice. The style of language, by itself, has made Slavovs think piece into a more easy to read format, and thus would successfully attract the her audiences interests of reading.

   Though with her great success in persuasion, Slavov has also made a few errors interms of reasoning. For example, she didnt manage to make intelligent and relevant criticisms of the authoritys public policy. Rather, he intended to delude her readers with petty and wild accusations against the government while didnt provide his audiences enough scholarly evidences and sources to argue against the rationality and scientific necessity of the policy as well as its influence.

  以上相关信息由三立在线为你提供,希望阅读完以上文章后,你能有所收获,对学习有一定的帮助,更多资讯请访问三立在线,专业老师为你指导讲解相关疑惑,为你的考试之路保驾护航。

三立在线SAT课程包括:

1.SAT一对一全程班:

测听(督导测听基础情况、教师测听知识点掌握情况)—>安排课程计划(教师上课计划+督导计划)—>课程执行与反馈—>期中测评—>课程执行与反馈、答疑—>期末测评—>预警测评—>考前点题—>考前答疑。

上课材料:OG、Khan、真题、Kallis、IES题目精讲精练;

教师上课方式:方法论(1/4课程时间)+专题训练(1/4课程时间)+套题训练(1/4课程时间)+查缺补漏(1/4课程时间)

督导材料:(词汇为例)根据学生目前的词汇情况选择以下材料:基础1600次、强化1600次、套题词汇、SAT分级单词;

督导方式:讲词、背词、抽词

三立在线针对2018年的SAT1考试,开设“SAT1基础课程、强化课程、刷题模考课程、冲刺课程”。想快速提分的同学可以在线咨询客服,了解课程详情,预约名师1V1试听课;为你量身打造专属SAT1学习方案;免费领取SAT1考试学习资料/视频课件/直播公开课/SAT1模考题库/原版英文杂志!

送你SAT写作范文


评论(0)

×
咨询热线
SAT考试贴士 11月有 0 场SAT考试
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
考试小帮手
SAT名师直通车
  • 孙中秋 国内最早一批SAT名师
    8年+教学经验
    中国地质大学硕士
    预约名师
    黄茜子 托福、AP、IB高分名师
    2年+教学经验
    加拿大渥太华大学硕士
    预约名师
    陈丽 托福、GRE高分名师
    5年+教学经验
    美研精英计划规划师
    预约名师
    沈虹余 ACT、SAT2名师
    3年+教学经验
    美国凯斯西储大学硕士
    预约名师
    丁维 托福高分名师
    5年+教学经验
    上海对外贸易大学硕士
    预约名师
  • 李现伟 三立在线创始人 CEO
    10年+教学经验
    国内权威全科教学专家
    预约名师
    关梦瑶 SAT、AP名师
    3年+教学经验
    新加坡国立大学硕士
    预约名师
    范志文 SSAT、SAT、SAT2名师
    4年+教学经验
    东华大学工科硕士
    预约名师
加入SAT学习圈
SAT学习圈
嗨词APP: iOS版下载 嗨词APP-iOS版下载 Android版下载 嗨词APP-Android版下载
进SAT答疑群,请加助教老师微信: anne020508